Sample frameDay 096·Negotiation · Prepare

Good morning. You've already chosen the room you'll walk into on Thursday. You just didn't do it deliberately.

Negotiation.

Setting the Table

5 min read·Apply by lunch

The question

Take the largest deal open to you this morning: can you name every person whose yes it needs, the order you mean to reach them in, and the one issue you'd add to the list to make the whole thing easier? Most preparation stops at choosing what number to say first, which is the smallest of those decisions and the only one anybody rehearses.

The idea

David Lax and James Sebenius have written together since The Manager as Negotiator in 1986; Sebenius teaches negotiation at Harvard Business School. In November 2003 they published '3-D Negotiation: Playing the Whole Game' in Harvard Business Review, and expanded it into a book three years later. Their claim is that most negotiators work only one dimension of a three-dimensional game. The first is tactics: what happens at the table, the persuasion, the reading of the room. The second is deal design: the structure of the agreement, the issues on the list, the contingencies that turn an argument about the future into a clause. The third is the setup — the moves made away from the table that settle who's negotiating, over what, in what sequence, and against what alternatives. Setup isn't the preamble to the negotiation; most of the time it is the negotiation. It also collects the fewest hours of the three, and the reason is easy enough to see: tactics are visible, dramatic and immediate, while setup is quiet, undramatic and usually decisive. The trap is accepting whatever table you're offered and then trying to win at it.

The framework

01
Choose the parties before you choose the arguments.
Before you draft a line of what you'll say, list every person whose agreement the deal actually needs — not just the person across the table, but the finance lead who signs, the operations manager who inherits the work, the incumbent supplier whose relationship you're ending, the board member who'll ask one question. Then list who could block it, which is a different list. The failure that follows is always the same shape: you negotiate brilliantly with the only person who was ever going to say yes, then meet the real decision three weeks later with no preparation and no relationship.
02
One issue on the table is a tug of war.
With a single issue in play the only available moves are to pull harder or let go, and no amount of skill invents a third. Deal design starts by adding issues the other side may value differently to you: term length, payment timing, scope boundaries, exclusivity, volume commitments, a reference, a start date, who carries which risk. Write down eight before the meeting, including the ones you expect to discard, because you can't invent a trade under pressure with a counterpart watching your face. A short list is a decision to argue about price.
03
Backwards from the hardest yes.
Decide who you need on board last, then work backwards to who you should reach first. If the finance director is the hard yes, ask what would make that conversation easy: probably the operations lead already committed, probably one number independently verified by someone their team trusts. Go and get those first. Working through people in the order they're easiest to reach is just reading down your diary, and it burns your strongest advocate on a conversation that happened too early to count.
04
Everything here takes weeks, and none of it can be done on the day.
Adding a party, building a credible alternative, changing the agenda, moving a deadline — each is a fortnight of work, and none of them can be improvised in the room. So run the setup on a calendar rather than in a meeting: two or three weeks out, ask what the table should look like, then spend the time making it look that way. The negotiators who appear effortless on the day are almost always the ones who spent a month rebuilding what the day was for.

Members only · 4 principles + template + AI mentor

364 more frameworks are waiting.

Setting the Table is Day 1 of 365. One framework every morning for a year — across strategy, sales, negotiation, leadership, and more.

$1 /day

Billed $365/yr · cancel any time

365 frameworks

12 topics · templates · AI mentor

Reserve your place — $365/yr →

One payment a year · the whole library · no auto-renewal.

More Negotiation frameworks

All 24 negotiation frameworks →