Sample frameDay 072·Decisions · Dissent

Good morning. Every decision you make has an opposing case, and nobody in the room is paid to make it.

Decisions.

Red Teaming

5 min read·Apply by lunch

The question

Think of the largest decision your business has made this year, and name the person whose job it was to argue against it. If the honest answer is nobody, or the most junior person in the room for five uncomfortable minutes at the end, then the strongest case against that decision has still not been made — and you will meet it later, from the market, at full price.

The idea

Two rooms get the same problem and the same lone objector. In one the objector genuinely disagrees; in the other they have been told to play devil's advocate. The rooms do not think alike. Charlan Nemeth, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley, ran that comparison with Keith Brown and John Rogers and published it in 2001: people performing the assigned role produced less original thinking than authentic dissenters, and the majority often finished more confident than before, reassured that the objections had been aired and survived. The rest of her work, gathered in In Defense of Troublemakers (2018), is the case for the real thing — a group that hears a genuine minority view searches wider, generates more options and reaches better judgements, even when the dissenter turns out to be wrong. Red teaming is the organisational answer to that gap: not a role performed for ten minutes at the end of a meeting, but a real brief, given to named people, resourced and rewarded, to construct the strongest available case that you are about to make a mistake. Most people test their decisions by describing them to allies.

The framework

01
Commission it while you can still change your mind.
Red teaming only pays while the decision is still reversible — a two-way door in Day 64's terms — which means commissioning it at the moment you would rather not: after your case is strong enough to be worth attacking, before it has been announced, priced or promised to anyone. Write a short charter naming the specific decision under review, the evidence and access the team gets, the date they report and who reads the report. A review convened once the contract is drafted and the launch date is public is not a red team, it is a formality with a budget. By then the only finding available to them is a delay nobody in the room will accept.
02
Real dissent has to cost you something.
The office is old. From 1587 the Vatican employed a promoter of the faith, briefed and paid to argue against every candidate for sainthood, and the post was only cut back in 1983. Paid is the operative word. Nemeth's finding is that dissent everybody knows is assigned gets quietly discounted, so give the job to someone with standing rather than the newest hire, who will read the room and soften. Give them real time in the week to do it properly rather than the gaps between other work, and reward the quality of the argument rather than whether it turns out to be right. Where the stakes are large, buy the dissent outright: an outside adviser, a former competitor, someone whose next invoice does not depend on your comfort.
03
Brief them to build the case, not to collect quibbles.
A red team asked to find flaws returns a list of small objections, and small objections can be answered one at a time until the decision survives by attrition rather than by merit. Brief them for the affirmative instead: write the memo a rival chief executive would circulate explaining precisely why this fails, and make the best case for the opposite decision. Then demand structure — the three assumptions the decision rests on, which is most likely to be false, what you would observe if it were, and the cheapest test that settles it. An objection with a test attached is worth ten with rhetoric attached.
04
Give every finding a disposition, in writing.
The usual ending is the polite thank you: the work is heard, the rigour is admired, and the plan proceeds untouched. Force a disposition instead. Every finding gets one of three, written down with a name against it — accepted, and here is what changes; rejected, and here is the reason, now on the record and readable back to you in six months; or tested, and here is the experiment that runs before the money moves. Keep the team advisory, because a red team holding a veto stops arguing and starts negotiating. Then rotate the role, so dissent never hardens into a faction.

Members only · 4 principles + template + AI mentor

364 more frameworks are waiting.

Red Teaming is Day 1 of 365. One framework every morning for a year — across strategy, sales, negotiation, leadership, and more.

$1 /day

Billed $365/yr · cancel any time

365 frameworks

12 topics · templates · AI mentor

Reserve your place — $365/yr →

One payment a year · the whole library · no auto-renewal.

More Decisions frameworks

All 28 decisions frameworks →