Keeping things separate has a price. Almost nobody has ever calculated it.
Operations.
Pooling
Count the places you hold the same thing separately — stock split across three sites, cover split across four teams, a queue forming in front of each person rather than in front of all of them — and ask what it costs to keep them apart. Nobody invoices you for that number. Which is exactly why it has survived every budget you've ever run.
Every queue that feeds several counters at once — the bank, the airport, the passport hall — is a piece of arithmetic made physical, and it's the same arithmetic that sets how much stock you hold. Pool a set of uncertain demands and the average adds in full, but the variability adds far more slowly, because it's the variances that add rather than the swings themselves. So the cushion you need per unit of demand shrinks as the pool grows. Gary Eppen, a professor at the University of Chicago's business school, put a number on that in Management Science in 1979, in a paper with a title nobody quotes and a result everybody uses: Effects of Centralization on Expected Costs in a Multi-Location Newsboy Problem. Take a set of locations, each holding its own buffer against its own uncertain demand, and merge them into one. Where those demands are genuinely independent, the expected cost of holding and running short falls by a factor of the square root of the number of locations. Four depots become one and the buffer cost halves. Nine become one and it falls to a third. The size of the prize isn't set by how big your buffers are. It's set by how many separate piles you're keeping them in.
Members only · 4 principles + template + AI mentor
364 more frameworks are waiting.
Pooling is Day 1 of 365. One framework every morning for a year — across strategy, sales, negotiation, leadership, and more.
$1 /day
Billed $365/yr · cancel any time
365 frameworks
12 topics · templates · AI mentor
One payment a year · the whole library · no auto-renewal.